I do have 964 SNGs in my database. Most of
them are 18 seaters, but also 36, 40, 45 and 180 seaters all at different
buy-ins.
My total results are:
SNGs played: 964
Total buy-in: $2269.95
Total Pay-out: $2309.89
Profit: $39.94
ITM%: 23.96%
Profit per SNG: $0.04
Seats
|
Number
|
Profit/Loss
|
ITM%
|
Profit per game
|
18
|
844
|
$-87.82
|
25%
|
$-0.1
|
36
|
1
|
$-2.2
|
0%
|
$-2.2
|
40
|
2
|
$-2.2
|
0%
|
$-1.1
|
45
|
52
|
$38.16
|
25%
|
$0.73
|
180
|
65
|
$94
|
10.77%
|
$1.45
|
Based on this table I should be focusing on
the 45 and 180 seater. The profit @ the 180 seater, almost completely comes
from winning one with a buy-in of $2.2. Good for a pay-out of $108. So it is
strange to see that I did choose the 18 seater. The reason behind this is
unknown to me. Maybe I should try to include some 45 or 180 seaters in the SNG
I intend to play before the end of the year? But I do firmly believe
In the rest of this post I will just ignore
the 36 and 40 seaters.
Lets analyze first the 18 seater, my
favorite playground.
Buy-in
|
Number
|
Profit/Loss
|
ITM%
|
FT%
|
Profit per game
|
$1.2
|
1
|
$-1.2
|
0%
|
0%
|
$-1.2
|
$1.5
|
358
|
$-59.55
|
16.67%
|
33.33%
|
$-0.17
|
$1.75
|
277
|
$60.65
|
27.8%
|
53.79%
|
$0.22
|
$3.4
|
134
|
$-50.6
|
23.88%
|
53.73%
|
$-0.38
|
$3.5
|
6
|
$-15.32
|
16.67%
|
50%
|
$-2.55
|
$6.5
|
66
|
$-7.8
|
22.73%
|
40.91%
|
$-0.12
|
$7
|
2
|
$-14
|
0%
|
0%
|
$-7
|
The $1.5 and $1.75 should be analyzed
combined, just as the $3.4 and $3.5. Cause these are more or less the same
SNGs, but changed in buy-in level after the changes in Pokerstars.
I should avoid the higher buy-in levels,
these are costing me money meaning that I’m not ready for these levels. In this
prospect it is good that I did choose the $1.5 as my habitat.
The SNG above $1.75 are good for a combined
loss of around $87. So all my loss at the 18 seaters can be related to these
levels.
If we look at the 45 seaters, we have the
following table:
Buy-in
|
Number
|
Profit/Loss
|
ITM%
|
Profit per game
|
$0.25
|
14
|
$-2,52
|
14.29%
|
$-0.18
|
$0.5
|
8
|
$11.38
|
50%
|
$1.42
|
$1.1
|
2
|
$2.8
|
50%
|
$1.4
|
$3.25
|
6
|
$-4.5
|
33.33%
|
$-0.75
|
$6..5
|
22
|
$31
|
18.18%
|
$1.41
|
The only buy-in which can reflect a little
bit my level of play on the 45 seater is that $6.5 buy-in. And even this sample
size is way to low to base conclusions on.
Still we have a combined profit of $38.16. At
the $6.5 buy-in, I did have 4 cashes, but they represent a second place, 2
third places and a fourth place.
The sample size on the 180 seaters is also
to low to analyze, but for completeness here it is:
Buy-in
|
Number
|
Profit/Loss
|
ITM%
|
Profit per game
|
$1
|
1
|
$-1
|
0%
|
$-1
|
$2.2
|
53
|
$70.6
|
5.66%
|
$1.33
|
$2.5
|
8
|
$-20
|
0%
|
$-2.5
|
$4.4
|
3
|
$44.4
|
33.33%
|
$14.8
|
Only the $2.2 can give me some insight.
Sample size here is above 50, which could give some direction. Compared with
the 45 and surely the 18 seater, the ITM% is of course much lower.
Most part of the profit is based on one 1.
Without this win I would had to write red figures.
So where does this bring me?
I do know the following facts:
-
I should avoid playing on Monday
or Saturday. Both are loosing days.
-
Most games are played in
October and November. Days are getting shorter, so much time available to play
poker.
-
I’m a winning player. Not by
much, but a fact is a fact.
-
I’m not ready for higher
buy-ins.
-
I should not only focus on the
18 seaters.
The plan of attack:
Like said before I do plan to play 100 18
seaters before the end of the year. Hoping to make a profit.
But based on the stats I should not neglect
the 45 or 180 seater. Based on the difference in duration between these 2, I
will add some 45 seaters to my game plan.
When I do start a season I will fire up 2
18 seaters and 1 45 seater. Still have to look at the buy-in level available
these days. If still available I will go for the $1.1.
This choice is based on the current
bankroll I have. I do aim to play 25 of these day before the end of year.
Good luck,
Dremeber